Infographic: Eliminating “Proof of Concept” Friction for Web Application & API Protection (WAAP) Platforms
When it comes to vendor evaluation for new services, any software sales team can tell…
We hear often from customers who replace a legacy web application firewall (WAF) with Signal Sciences next-gen WAF about why they made the switch. Almost always, those reasons are a variation on the following themes:
Few security experts would dispute the fact that legacy WAF appliances—hardware or virtual—can’t keep up with today’s rapid codebase changes and release cycles. Meanwhile, stories of successful breaches caused by web layer attacks like account takeover hit the headlines regularly. Overburdened security and operation teams must deal with a wide range of issues every day, so having a legacy WAF in place that generates too many false positives is not helping the cause of solidifying an organization’s overall security posture.
The process of evaluating and choosing a replacement for a legacy WAF can be summarized in three overall steps:
There are key differences between legacy and next-gen WAF: you should look for advanced web attack protection that does not negatively impact your business operations or create blockers for the development cycle. Many solutions can either unnecessarily block legitimate web requests and/or degrade performance. If the legacy WAF goes down for whatever reason, your apps will not be reachable by customers. And as mentioned prior, legacy WAF appliances also require significant maintenance costs.
Don’t accept vendor claims at face-value and make sure you know what you’re getting. Claims of “next-generation” web app security are plentiful, but it’s important to validate what the vendor is promising. Use relevant customer references, case studies or take advantage of a product demo if one is available. Net-net, you need to get answers to key questions such as:
Don’t underestimate the importance of fast-time-to-value: the sooner you can deploy web layer protection in production, the sooner your organization will realize security value from the WAF investment.
If the WAF solution is going to take months to deploy and requires complex management that will consume IT resources, it may not be worth pursuing. Organization invest heavily in a solution only to abandon it and replace it with a next-gen WAF like Signal Sciences: when stakeholders see the solution being used only in “monitoring” mode because it’s too resource-draining to operate on a continuous basis, they know it’s time to move on. The infographic below will walk you through the overall steps to replacing a legacy WAF, or alternatively show you how easy it is to deploy and gain security value from a true next-gen WAF.
Our award-winning next-gen WAF was built to provide effective web protection and fast time to value. Your development teams can use the production feedback to harden their code prior to release and security teams can defend those apps upon deployment to production with superior automated protection. Request a demo today to learn more from one of our application security experts.
(Clicking or pressing on the image will open it in a new browser window for saving and sharing.)